Theological Community, EcoTheology, The Church, The World, The Blogosphere

Evangelism for the 21st century IS Earth -Honoring Reformation

August 18, 2015 By: Theoblogical Category: ecotheology, People's Climate, Theoblogical

Good News is good in light of , and “sounds good” because of , the bad. The bad has brought us to believe that this is “the way things are” and “meant to be”. The Good News arrives as an announcement that “the way things are” is something else. It’s not Caesar, but the Kingdom of God. The Kingdom of Caesar is not the status quo, but God’s telos (end or purpose toward which it moves) is.

An “Earth-Honoring Faith”* is what God’s blueprint proclaims. It works against the inequitable use of resources such that the wealthy dont have more of the stuff of life (and I’m not talking about the “stuff” that people amass and consume, but the “stuff” which enables life).

And the quintessential story of inequitable distribution (or extraction and consumption) is the story of the “homo colossus”; of the Overshoot authored by technical, industrial humanity. To “reveal” or “uncover” this reality is to start with apocalypse (which is to reveal or uncover) and let that uncovering ; that expose, bring forth the Good News: that the Earth is God’s good creation and the setting and source for all that God has brought forth, in which “we live, and move, and have our being”. So the Revelation that our faith is an Earth-Honoring Faith, is a proclamation of the Good News.

* I took that from the title of Larry Rasmussen’s book “Earth Honoring Faith: Religious Ethics in a New Key” (and I’m presently starting to read his earlier work almost 20 years ago, Eath-Community, Earth Ethics, which has sounded a theme which has brought about my conclusion here that Earth-Honoring Faith IS the Good News for today. If we don’t heed that, it’s going to be nothing but bad news.

The awakening we need requires urgency translated down to the communities

August 16, 2015 By: Theoblogical Category: ecotheology, Occupy Theology, People's Climate, Theoblogical

In Margaret Swedish ‘s amazing and disturbing and yet, hopeful book,  this quote  is but one of the instances where she expresses the feeling about the responsibility of the theological communities to awaken their people from “slumber” and out of the practical denial that keeps us procrastinating the measures we need to be instigating in response to the Climate Crisis.  An article here and there just doesn’t cut it.  AT ALL.  “Better than nothing” is not an option.  Talking about it as “an issue” doesn’t even cut it.  IN some cases,  it’s not even listed among the list of “issues” or “topics”  (as is the case with the “Topics” section on their
website.  I pick on the UMC because I worked on that Website,  and am a United Methodist for the past 25-30 years. )  But I have walked through that door and into a different place regarding the climate,  where there is no going back into a prior sense of this crisis.  It now looms as the greatest existential threat that humankind has ever faced.  Some consider this to be hyperbole,  but it is far from it.  Charges of “hyperbole” come from within the vast denial with which we are ladened,  which keep us from the kind of action we need. So let me allow Margaret to speak:

“Because I believe this is true, that living beyond the “end of the world depends upon the awakening, visionary leadership, and cooperation of religions across boundaries of traditions and or it is also urgent and necessary that this awakening be translated down with similar urgency to the communities inspired by, or dwelling within, those traditions.
This disconnect of which Tucker and Grim speak* (see below) is not only between our awareness of the crisis and our ability to change direction, but also between what many religious institutions and leaders know and write about the crisis and what is actually communicated in sermons, teachings, schools, bible classes, catechisms, and more, among their faithful. The language of “patterns of acquisition and consumption” needs to become concrete in the daily living out of our lives, in the choices we make about how we live, in how we reshape the politics of the country in keeping with the exigencies of the crisis and how the community of faith takes up the challenge set in the last chapter in the concrete witness of that community- to bring the ecological foot-print of the human species back into balance with the life systems of the planet while allowing billions of poor people to no longer be poor. Whatever one’s religious tradition, this should be at the very heart of the project of faith from here on out”

* There’s a puzzling disconnection between our growing awareness of environmental problems and our ability to change our present direction. We have failed to translate facts about the environmental crisis into effective action in the United States. We are discovering that the human heart is not changed by facts alone but by engaging visions and empowering values. Humans need to see the large picture and feel they can act to make a difference. Mary Evelyn Tucker and John Grim, “Daring to Dream: Religion and the Future of the Earth”, in “God’s Green Earth: Creation , Faith, Crisis,” Special issue of “Reflections: A Magazine of Theological and Ethical Inquiry” Yale Divinity School (Spring 2007).

Margaret Swedish hits the nail on the head here when she points out how there are denominational leaders who write and speak about the crisis,  but “what is actually communicated in sermons, teachings, schools, bible classes, catechisms, and more, among their faithful”  is a whole other ball game.  This HAS to change.  I’ve been trying to communicate this to the UMC website folks,  but thus far,  what I’ve gotten are responses that indicate that the “crisis level” is the farthest from their consciousness it can be.  “No time or enough staff” to cover it sufficiently,  and this is all the more apparent when there is “other news” ,  which seems to the case in perpetuity. While there are certainly many people in the UMC who recognize the threat and the call that beckons from it,  all of this remains in the background as far as the larger church is concerned.  Nothing changes on the Home pages to give any indication that the church considers this to be of any grave importance.  Some of us have been “conspiring” in conversations about how we might change this.  One might say to “forget about denominations”, since they tend to be struggling for survival, or mired in political correct-ness,  and put all our money on ecumenical effort.  But we are going to need EVERYONE.

Two faces of Apocalypse: The Church must take on the call to preach both in a time of Climate Crisis.

August 12, 2015 By: Theoblogical Category: ecotheology, Occupy Theology, People's Climate, Theoblogical

I just finished the book (Ask the Beasts: Darwin and the God of Love by Elizabeth A. Johnson) this morning, and I’ve been wandering ( and wondering) about for a couple of hours since. I’ve spent a part of that time diving back into Margaret Swedish’s “Living Beyond the End of the World: A Spirituality of Hope”. These two books have been like reading Apocalyptic Scripture ( with a strong dose of both major thrusts of apocalypse: 1. Sin, darkness and destruction and 2. Promise and Restoration). Both these books availed themselves of that healthy, realistic balance of both themes, but ” Living Beyond the End…” …takes on directly the hard task of accepting the reality of what’s happening,  which is to be heavy on the first thrust;  the dire, death-threatening circumstances we face.

It’s not only just “threatening”;  this has been at work inducing death;  the deaths of species at an unprecedented rate.  The death of people from unprecedented and extreme weather inducing disasters,  creating refugees,  disease,  and wars.  And these will only worsen as we continue to do everything to worsen the problem:  clear cutting forests to make way for technological agriculture and even agriculture for the purpose of producing soybeans and corn and palm oil for fuels,  which are being found to be woefully inadequate alternatives,  not to mention the relative loss of that arable land for growing products to be used for food,  and the forcing out of small farmers from the process as the large corporations bring in the heavy machinery,  producing massive amounts of additional CO2.

It is the role of apocalypse to “UNVEIL” (which is the meaning of the word).  To tell the story that needs to be told to reveal that something is dreadfully wrong.  This seems to be the biggest struggle for our culture,  which wants to hold on fast to the idea that “we got this”.  The faith in “unlimited progress” is “dying hard” (holding on for dear life seems more accurate).  And  this is most disturbing when I see it at play in the church.  I see,  everyday the continued absence of an appropriate sense of urgency.  I see denominations avoiding the topic altogether on their denominational websites,  which are their number one public facing source of information about who they are.  The websites represent a way to tell their story and describe what they are about.  There seems to be scarcely any awareness that we face anything like an unprecedented civilizational challenge,  which would seem to put this on an emergency footing.  This is a challenge that goes deep into who we are as a people,  inducing re-evaluation, re-thinking and reformation of our theology itself  (since much of Western Christianity has been negligent in giving blessing to the “full-speed ahead” of industrial civilization’s shaping of our desires and values which have sent us hurdling down the path of “Overshoot”: Overshoot being the title of William Catton’s book on how we humans have overshot the natural sustainability processes and resources of the earth).

If we are faced with such a challenge,  and need a full-scale re-orientation of our economy, way of living,  and also our theology (so as to recover the deeply ecological message that our Western hermeneutic has lost),  isn’t this something that ought to be found somewhere in the church’s descriptions and stories about itself?  Doesn’t this warrant ,  at the VERY LEAST,  Front Page news?  Definitive re-assesment?  Laser-sharp focus on what we have to do going forward?  Or are we caught up in the denial that this just can’t be,  and that someone will come up with a heroic solution.  Are we operating on the denial that we are facing dire physical ramifications (and indeed, already experiencing them),  and just continuing to “Amuse Ourselves to Death”?  Isn’t there something about the church being a prophetic presence in the world;  a call to speak the truth and not waiting for the world to “get it” but to simply “live it” and to be able to articulate a word about “the hope that is within us”?


My challenge to UMComm and all church Communications agencies

August 09, 2015 By: Theoblogical Category: ecotheology, Media, Occupy Theology, People's Climate, Theoblogical

I posted this comment to UMNS Facebook post on UMComm (United Methodist Communicaitons) ‘s 75th anniversary observance:

UMComm has certainly been out there, utilizing media, telling the story, and telling lots of stories which have highlighted the church’s presence across a wide range of issues. This is something to be proud of. What I am wondering TODAY, however, is where Church Communications across the Christian church in today’s world will begin to bring home the gravity of the ecological crisis we face. Science has been warning us in no uncertain terms for over 30 years. The UMC has come out with statements acknowledging that the ecological situation is a moral issue. But it has been lacking , as have other churches and denominations, in truly communicating the depth of the challenge. This MUST change. I cannot repeat that and stand up and remind us of the deeply moral crisis this is, and that we MUST SPEAK UP about. UMCom , as with all other Christian churches and denominations are WELL PAST DUE on proper focus on this matter. It CANNOT continue to be ignored for weeks on end, even months. I recognized a couple of articles when the Pope released his Encyclical. GBGM has a missionary, Pat Watkins,, working with (sponsored by) the Council of Bishops, with the task of getting the church to start dialoguing about the implications of the Bishops letter, God’s Renewed Creation. It is time to start working on specific theological, liturgical, devotional, and political action to take. It’s going to require ALL of the above.

Pat Watkins told me in a conversation we had last week,  that he’d like to see “God’s Renewed Creation” become a sustained campaign on the level of a “Imagine No Malaria”  (“Imagine a Renewed Creation” isn’t bad,  as names for campaigns go).   But beyond the name,  the UMC MUST consider it a calling to advance way beyond the “every now and then” posting of an article about the Climate Crisis (and begin to communicate the very fact that it IS a CRISIS in the first place,  rather than just “an issue” (which, ironically,  doesn’t even appear on the “Topics” age on

Sunday morning reflections on “Creation” and “All Things”

August 09, 2015 By: Theoblogical Category: ecotheology, Occupy Theology, Theoblogical

One of those “all things” passages, in Colossians, 1, it is said of “The Son” that he is the “firstborn over all creation”; “He is before all things and in him all things hold together”; God was pleased to have all fullness dwell in him, and through him to reconcile to himself all things”. I cannot avoid the thought that although Paul (or whoever is the source of this hymn of Scripture) would not have known the science of the “all things” here (like where it all came from), that he had some transcendent vision of “all things” which satisfied him; that “all things” was beyond his comprehension, and yet it all holds together under that “LOGOS become SARCS”; not “WORD become anthropos (human) but WORD become SARCS (translated “flesh”, often in contexts of referring to the wider creation that INCLUDES humanity. (the latter, SARCS insight courtesy of “Elizabeth Johnson in Ask The Beasts”.

I am also intrigued by the creation story passage where it is said “And the Spirit of God moved (or “hovered”) upon the face of the waters”. Given that the life we now know originated in the teeming of life that swirled in the oceans and lakes and ponds, this is another intrigue like the “all things hold together” passage. Not that the authors of this creation story were aware that the origin of all life developed in conjunction with water, but that there was a deep sense of the “stuff of creation” being “hosted” by the water.

It’s a bit saddening that so much religious energy has been devoted to denying or shutting out continuing and historic scientific advances and theories, holding fast to “systemic formulation” based on the theological stories of “Creation”, as if those real comprehension stories, to be legitimate, must be construed literally and historically. The authors of those stories were not even conceiving of this being construed as a scientific conclusion or statement of fact. In “fact”, they had no comprehension or expectation or awareness of such; the age was truly “pre-scientific”. This is we humans, projecting our contemporary notions of literature and history and theology BACKWARD into a time where such things as modern science were not only NOT an ingredient of those writings, it was not on the radar.

Elizabeth Johnson points out that the creation stories themselves were written AFTER the exodus stories. The creation was a sending backward of the faith affirmation of a loving and liberating God who brought Israel out of Egypt, and a “faith history” proclaiming the same power that liberates also creates.